A lot of folks tell me they much prefer face-to-face time than computer time. When I agree with them, they look shocked.
Seriously?
I am rarely in an office or cubicle (though I'm about to go underground, but more on that later). Most of my day is invested in public and face-to-face. It's the jazz of my job!
I also see some of these folks who say they "prefer" face-to-face have no idea what it's like to be "out there" in a constant or consistent basis. Their F2F thing is a crutch and a sure sign they don't understand that social media is first, foremost and always will be "social."
Most of the social media engagers I know don't need to make cold calls anymmore. They can strike up a conversation anywhere and with anyone. They've become better at building relationships that matter because of who they are – and their use of social media amplifies their relationship-building skill set.
Truth or Consequences: Face-to-Face wins. Always. And one reason to engage within the conversphere using social media as part of your talknology practices – you will increase your quality face-to-face time.
Which is part of your goal, right? Or was that just a crutch due to some tire-kicking on your part?
Related Here:
- Does Twitter Replace Face-to-Face
- The F.A.C.E. of Social Media: Masks Off!
- Dang Technology! I Prefer Face-to-Face
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=e24e1f83-55bf-41a3-9be2-cb79266b8f42)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=37b7cf85-18b5-4f92-acfc-c9d83cf4ea8d)


![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=8df69ee4-c4cb-4057-a8fd-faa378b7cd62)